简介：　　 [摘要 ] 目的 研究对比超早期急性脑梗塞选择性动脉溶栓与静脉溶栓的疗效。方法 此次研究的对象是选取 2013年 12月— 2015年 11月在该院进行治疗的 140例急性脑梗塞患者，将其临床资料进行回顾性分析，并按患者自愿原则进行分组（对照组 35例采用静脉溶栓方法进行治疗；观察组 105例采用动脉溶栓方式进行治疗）并进行溶栓治疗，并对治疗后的评价指标内容（ NIHSS评分）进行统计分析。结果 采用动脉溶栓治疗患者的总有效率为 86.67%优于采用静脉溶栓治疗的对照组的 74.29%，比较差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。结论 对超早期急性脑梗塞患者采用两种溶栓方法均能获得较好的疗效，但采用动脉溶栓治疗效果更为理想。   　　 [关键词 ] 超早期急性脑梗塞；选择性动脉溶栓；静脉溶栓；疗效   　 [Objective] to compare the efficacy of selective arterial thrombolysis and intravenous thrombolysis in super early stage acute cerebral infarction. Methods the objective of this study was to select 140 patients with acute cerebral infarction treated in the hospital from December 2013 to November 2015. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed and grouped according to the voluntary principle of the patients (35 cases in the control group were treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy; 105 cases in the observation group were treated with arterial thrombolysis. " Treatment) and thrombolytic therapy, and the content of the evaluation index (NIHSS score) after treatment was statistically analyzed. Results the total effective rate of the patients treated with thrombolytic therapy was 86.67% better than that of the control group with intravenous thrombolytic therapy (74.29%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion two thrombolysis methods can achieve better results for patients with early acute cerebral infarction, but the effect of arterial thrombolysis is better.